Eleven AI subscriptions. Name one number they moved.
AI spend is the easiest cost in the company to see and the hardest to attribute. Most tools meter usage, so cost scales with activity while value stays anecdotal. You are paying more the busier your teams get, with no way to tell busy from productive.
Boxcar takes the opposite positions on purpose. You pay model providers directly; we never mark up your usage or sit between you and their invoice. There is no per-token tax, because governance should not get more expensive the more you govern. And pricing anchors on governed workflows in production, which means it tracks the outcomes you actually put live.
A multi-region operator recovered $500K in licensing in the first week of a governed rollout.
Most AI spend evaporates when the subscription lapses. This doesn't.
Finance tends to notice this before anyone else does. Every governed workflow leaves the company owning its own reasoning: the decisions, the alternatives, the evidence, inheritable by the next person and the next agent. An asset that compounds, not a burn that renews.
Which workflow could you defend doubling, and which could you defend cutting?
Usage stats answer neither. A Governed Proof of Value ends its five weeks with measured value per workflow, presented to the people who approve what happens next. That readout is the number the renewal meeting has been missing.
We do not publish a price list, because every engagement is scoped to real workflows. But three commitments hold at any deal size: no markup on your model usage, no metering, and pricing anchored to governed workflows in production. The full commercial model is a conversation, not a paywall.
Put a number on one workflow
Five weeks. One workflow. Measured value, and you keep every artifact whether or not you continue.